
|
|
Step-by-Step Examples: A contingency table shows numerically the results of an experiment in which the outcome is a categorical variable. Commonly, two groups of subjects are studied, and there are two possible outcomes. Suppose you treat 126 subjects with either a placebo or a new drug designed to decrease the incidence of coronary artery restenosis within 6 months after angioplasty. The numbers of subjects experiencing each outcome may be arranged on a 2 x 2 contingency table as follows:
In this step-by-step example, we'll analyze this table using Fisher's Exact test to answer the following question: If there were really no association between treatment and occurrence of restenosis within the observation period, what would be the chance that random sampling would produce an apparent association as strong, or stronger, than that observed in this experiment? Enter the Data In the lower half of the Welcome dialog, tell Prism how to format your data table. For the X column, select Text (bar graph). For the Y columns, choose A single column of values.
When you leave this dialog box, Prism displays the formatted table. Enter the datanumbers of subjects falling into each mutually exclusive category, not fractions or percentagesas follows:
Click on the yellow Graphs on the toolbar to view the bar chart that Prism has produced automatically (our illustration includes some editing not discussed here). For more information, consult this step-by step example on working with bar graphs.
Choose the Analysis and the Options
In the Contingency Tables dialog, accept the choice of Fisher's exact test, which is the default when you're analyzing a 2 x 2 table.
In the same dialog, set the checkboxes to do the optional Relative Risk calculation. All the settings are shown below; you can get more help understanding these settings by clicking Help me decide. View the Results
Further down the results sheet, Prism reports the relative risk. That number simply indicates that in this experiment there was a 39-percent greater incidence of restenosis among the drug-treated subjects. The wide 95% confidence interval for relative risk, which includes the value 1.0 (no association), is consistent with the lack of statistical significance (P > 0.05) noted above.
Copyright (c) 2002, GraphPad Software Inc. All rights reserved. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||